If you’re only interested to know what is my take on the controversial series, “Thirteen Reasons Why”, you can skip the lengthy post and just read the quoted text.
“13 Reasons Why” is obviously not a series intended for all audiences. And by groups of audience I don’t only mean according to age, but according their state of mental health. 13 reasons Why has a lot of sensitive scenes that for someone who is depressed, or had experienced the same fate as Hanah Baker could trigger or suggest a wrong method of handling their mental health problem. But for advocates, family, friends and support groups the story of Hanah Baker is a wake up call that we should do something. It is a good case study that shows (some but not all) the different factors that could contribute to one taking his/her life. And while you’re in it, try thinking of your friends, of your family, or colleagues and acquiantances. Try to look for Hanah Baker in your own circle; listen, understand, and be there for her.
13 Reasons Why revolves around the story of Hanah Baker, a high school girl, and the reasons why she took her own life. Before she died of suicide, she recorded 13 tapes intended to 13 different people she thought contributed to her death.
The series gathered a lot of controversies from the public as it showed sensitive scenes that could trigger someone to die of suicide or justify suicide as a means to end the suffering. The show had also shown detailed scenes of how the lead actress, Hanah Baker, slit her wrist and ended her life.
“13 Reasons Why” is obviously not a series intended for all audiences. It has target audiences and anyone who would want to watch it should watch with caution and should be open-minded about the film.
By target audience, I don’t only mean according to age, gender or social classification but according to their state of mental health. If by chance you are aware that you are depressed, or had experienced what Hannah Baker had experience then, by all means, I ask you to NOT watch the series. Even if you think that you are currently okay and that you are now emotionally and mentally stable, DO NOT watch the show as it will haunt you and feed you wrong messages. If you are unsure about the state of your well-being, then choose the safe side and do not watch the show. If you watched the show and you’re starting to see yourself in Hannah Baker’s shoes, you have to stop.
13 reasons Why has a lot of sensitive scenes that for someone who is depressed, or had experienced the same fate as Hanah Baker could trigger or suggest a wrong method of handling their mental health problem. (Spoiler) Especially on the last episode where Hanah Baker already sought the help of a health professional, but still failed and still decided to take her own life, it might give (or is giving) a wrong message that it becomes justifiable already that she took her own life because she did everything and that everything failed her. Suicidal is a difficult state to be in and a sensitive topic, and the series should have been cautious to not lead the story to dying of suicide as it might be mimic by someone watching the show. It should have given hope and second chances so that people who were feeling like Hanah Baker would hold on and continue to live.
If you are experiencing emotional crisis and in need of immediate assistance, please call the HOPELINE at (02) 804-4673 or 0917 558 4673, or you may visit a psych facility or clinic nearest you. Here is the database of the nearest psych clinic in the Philippines: bit.ly/MHPHServiceDatabase.
Suicide should never be portrayed as the solution and should not be justified as the only way out. The series somehow delivered the wrong message, and will somehow make you feel that it was okay for Hanah Baker to take her life because she was bullied, she was raped, she wasn’t heared of, her friends failed her, her guidance counselor failed her, society failed her– her life was difficult and that taking her life away is a justifiable choice, and you can just blame anybody and somebody about it.
It was also insensitive for the show to repeatedly describe victims of suicide as selfish, fame-whores, over reacting, and individuals looking for attention. Notions that were never resolved or corrected at the end of the show.
“Suicide isn’t selfish. It’s sad, yes, but not selfish. It’s selfish of those left behind to try to make light of the deceased’s situation. Suicide is not a selfish act. It’s not for attention. It’s for relief. As sad as that sounds, it is. Someone who commits suicide, who goes> all in> for an act that takes it all away, is looking for a way to feel better. At the point when someone is suicidal, they aren’t thinking about other people, but they aren’t thinking about themselves either. (Which, by definition, rules out their SELFishness.) They are lost, confused, and consumed by a dark feeling that takes away their ability to truly think about the world around them. They get swept up in a bad place and, sometimes, unfortunately, can’t find their way out” (Sarah Laughon, 2014)
What’s missing in the series also is that it failed to emphasize that Hanah Baker may actually be suffering from depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. The series could have used it as a medium to raise awareness on this topic and help people understand it better.
But for advocates, family, friends and support groups the story of Hanah Baker is a wake up call for us to be sensitive, vigilant, and kind to people around us. It is a good case study that showed (only some, not all) factors that could contribute to one taking his/her life.
The series slaps you in the face of the existing and still unresolved problem in the society: the culture of bullying in schools (not limited to high school), lack of/insufficient policy and system in schools to protect the kids, the lack of support systems from the family or friends, and the stigmas attached to mental health.
These gaps in the society could be, for advocates and experts, be looked into and targetted to save a Hanah Baker. A lot has been done, but still, a lot is left for us to do.
Since the release of “13 Reasons Why” it caused a lot of discussion in schools, news, and social media about mental health. It was a timely topic to portray in an international TV series to raise awareness about mental health and suicide, but it could’ve been done better and more sensitive. I do not want to call the series a piece of trash as, for me, it somehow invalidates and denies thefact that somehow there are Hanah Bakers in this world who needs help, but a work in progress. And no, I do not want it to be taken down (as many people already have watched it), rather I’d that Netflix should release a more sensitive version of it and a follow-up story to correct the stigma and misconceptions in the first season, and put a better closure and hope to those who were affected by it.
And if this post made you curious and decide to watch “13 Reasons Why”, my only advice is for you to watch it with caution and an open mind. And while you’re on it, try thinking of your friends, of your family, or colleagues and acquaintances. Try to look for Hanah Baker in your own circle; listen, understand, and let them know you’ll be there for her.
Because after all, we do not want to end up listening to tapes and being told we’re too late.
Bonus thought: My colleagues in the medical field had been wondering why the series showed Hanah Baker slitting her arms longitudinally and wondered if that could actually caused her to die. My theory is that the producers intentionally showed is it in that way so that in case there will be someone who would mimic the act, they would least likely die of hemorrhage and will just pass out. Just a theory though.
(Draft) I just had the most EPIC experience in watching a theater play today.
[/] Hinarang ng Guard.
[/] Natawagan ang cast.
[/] Sinundo ng staff.
[/] Diniscountan ang ticket.
[/] AT Pinaupo sa front row center seat.
I thought that was the highlight of my theater experience for the month April but my experience and realization after watching the show was awesome.
I was supposed to watch W;T the day after when I got stuck with my homework and decided to run to Trinity University of Asia to watch there and then. I did not realize that the security of the TUA is very strict that they are demanding for tickets before I can actually enter the campus. Of course, since it’s an impromptu decision, I wasn’t able to buy one. So I tried calling the number in the poster asking how I can enter, (or buy a ticket for me to enter the campus). That was 5:50 pm, 10 minutes before the start of the show.
Fortunately, the phone rang and someone answered the phone. The universe must be playing games with me, the person on the other end of the line was the cast/ producer of the show, Francis Mattheau. Fortunately, though, Francis was very accommodating and find people to help me (actually fetch me) from the entrance going to the theater house.
Fortunate events after fortunate events, the staff told me that the price ticket for today’s run, since it was a TUA sponsored event, was at P300.00 pesos only (Original P1000). And it did not end there, she even ushered me to the front row!
I must have done something great to deserve this. Thank you to the cast and staff!
Now on the play.
Tami Monsod played the role of Vivian Bearing, a brilliant and uncompromising professor of English Literature diagnosed with a terminal ovarian cancer. She specializes in the Holy Sonnets of John Donne famously know for his literary pieces on death, poetry, and the use of “;” instead of “,”. Ms. Tami Monsod nailed tremendously the role of Vivian. Sobrang galing, at madadala ka talaga. She had an amazing interpretation of Vivian Bearing. Her act was very precise and you can really see and feel that she gave all her heart (and hair) to give justice to the role. There were a lot of scenes that I would already want to stand from where I’m sitting and hug her.
Mikkie Bradshaw played the role of Susie Monahan, a registered nurse, and chief nurse in charge of Vivian. I met Mikkie Bradshaw from Fun Home where she played the role of Middle-Aged Alison (I’m so glad she remembered me). She was my favorite character then, and again in this play. I am so amazed by how she transformed from a middle-aged confused kid to a compassionate and very kind nurse. I will never forget the last scene with her and the dead body of Vivian where I almost lost control and planned to go up to the stage to hug and comfort her. Susie highlighted the most significant trait of the Nurses in the health care community which is compassion. They are smart, reliable, and compassionate. A trait that is often lost by people in this field.
I had a chance to talk to Mikkie after the show and I asked her how was it playing the role of Susie. She said it was very different, and difficult at the same time. She needed to squeeze her brains out to understand some of the lines since there was a deep literary poem, and she had to act to be genuinely kind.
Bibo Reyes played the role of Jason Posner, M.D. Of all the characters, he was the character I relate myself so well. He was an oncologist, a scientist, a researcher. He studies and conducts research to save lives of many people (such as I). But in doing so, forgets the life of the human being in front of him. He was so into his research that he went almost desperate just to make his research succeed. Like many researchers and doctors nowadays, often, we see patients as mere cases studies and good sources of data that we forget that it’s a life of a human being that we’re dealing with. Bibo was so effective with his role, aside from his charm that captivated the audience that very moment he stepped out of the stage, he delivered his lines and gave an awesome portrayal of an aspiring Oncologist, ambitious scientist, inhumane doctor, and desperate human being wanting to help mankind but forgets to be a human.
Other casts include Raymund Concepcion as Harvey Kelekian/ E.M. Ashford/ Mr. Bearing, Francis Mattheu, Jillian Ita-as, Anikka Estrada, and John de Lima as the Lab Technicians/ Students/ Fellows.
“It is not my intention to give away the plot; but I think I die at the end.” – Margaret Edson, Wit
The story revolved around the last remaining days of Vivian Bearing, a great professor of English Literature. She was diagnosed with stage 4 ovarian cancer and had to undergo a chemotherapy treatment– an unguaranteed and experimental chemotherapy treatment. It was a narration of her life: as a student in English literature, as an uncompromising professor, as a daughter, as a patient, as a subject for a case study.
The story is very moving as it captures and marries English literature, through words and sonnets; and health science, through data and research. I like how the play showcased the commonalities of the two fields and their common differences.
It reminds every literary major, health sciences experts, and human beings in the audience to be human. To never forget, as we strive for greatness and optimum knowledge, to be kind. Sometimes, as literary majors, we are too overwhelmed by understanding and interpreting life and death into words that we forgot about life, and to live. Sometimes, as health researchers, we are too perplexed by the wonders of the human body that we forgot to be human, and that who we’re dealing with are humans.
We must always strive, not to be great, but to be kind. “Now is a time for, dare I say it, kindness. I thought being extremely smart would take care of it. But I see I have been found out.” ― Vivian Bearing,
After going out of the theater teary-eyed and extremely moved, I highly recommend that you watch this play, “W;t: A play by Margaret Edson”. It is the first time that the play is being adapted in Asia brough to you by Twin Bill. They still have five remaining shows: April 29 (3:00 pm and 8:00 pm), April 30 (3:00 pm), May 2 (8:00 pm) and May 3 (6:00 pm) at Mandell Hall, Trinity University of Asia.
Holy Sonnets: Death, be not proudDeath, be not proud, though some have called theeMighty and dreadful, for thou art not so;For those whom thou think’st thou dost overthrowDie not, poor Death, nor yet canst thou kill me.From rest and sleep, which but thy pictures be,Much pleasure; then from thee much more must flow,And soonest our best men with thee do go,Rest of their bones, and soul’s delivery.Thou art slave to fate, chance, kings, and desperate men,And dost with poison, war, and sickness dwell,And poppy or charms can make us sleep as wellAnd better than thy stroke; why swell’st thou then?One short sleep past, we wake eternallyAnd Death shall be no more; Death, thou shalt die.
—-Photo opportunity with the cast—-
20 Questions is a one-act play by Juan Ekis about two friends locked in one room for twenty-four hours. It was my first time to watch a Juan Ekis play, and unlike other plays I’ve watched, Juan Ekis brings the audience to the scene itself. The entire room was designed and set-upped to feel like the stage itself. The intimacy between the actors and the audience is close you would feel like you’re actually on the scene–witnessing the dialogues of the characters.
It was my first time to watch a Juan Ekis play, and unlike other plays I’ve watched, Juan Ekis brings the audience to the scene itself. The entire room was designed and set-upped to feel like the stage. The intimacy between the actors and the audience is so close you could feel like you’re actually on the scene witnessing the dialogues of the characters.
It didn’t actually felt like watching a well-rehearsed play, it felt like just watching two people talking about their belief, ideals, and perspectives.
I had a hard time connecting with Jigs’ character, played by Jedidah Maigue, at first. He was acting, he was himself acting as Jigs. It took him a while to find grounding and be more comfortable on stage. It only came at the later part where his dialogues became more spontaneous and more natural. But of course, it is also because Jigs’ character is difficult. (If you read the script) Most of his lines are short responses to Yumi and thus it is difficult to establish his character- a gentleman, hopeless romantic, but fun to be with kind of guy. Nevertheless, Jedidah Maigue did a good job portraying the role of Jigs.
Yumi was played by Diandra Concepcion. She was very comfortable with the role. She put a lot of adlibs, and improvisations to make her character her. And it made her dialogues more natural, and spontaneous. She seemed to really enjoyed playing the character, and it reciprocated because it was also enjoyable watching her.
I’ve read the script many times over when I was college. I got interested in the dialogues and the character of Jigs. I believe that we share the same point of view towards love, sex, and relationship. And, yes, I’d probably answer the 20 questions in the same way as Jigs– Because yeah, I am so Jigs in so many levels. It’s like me watching myself having a conversation with someone explaining my beliefs and points of view in life.
Jigs was carefully established from the start to represent the conservative (using this word loosely) POV. The type of people who are not very open talking about sex, can’t even say it on public [Scene: Sige nga sabihin mo nga, Sex, Sex, Sex!]. He’s the guy who believes in preserving virginity after marriage and offer it as the greatest gift for his soon to be wife (yes, I share that same belief too). He represents those individuals who value purity and chastity. He believes that love is about commitment and that marriage is no trial and error. The kind of mindset that brought him his first heartbreak. Jigs and his girlfriend, Trisha, broke up after he declined his girlfriend’s invitation to live together, to try it out as a couple before actually getting married. He refused because he thought why would that be necessary, there is no practice game for marriage where it is okay to fail. You have to be sure. Two months later, he found out her girlfriend to be pregnant and eventually got married to someone else.
Yumi represents the liberated (again using the word loosely) group of people where she takes love, sex, and relationship not seriously. She had her first sex when she was in high school, followed by much more, had several boyfriends, and even experienced having two boyfriends at once. For her, having sex is like eating when you feel hungry, sleeping when you get tired– a basic need, no big deal; and that love is nothing but a trial and error. She had this belief until she got pregnant. She had two boyfriends at that time and got dump by one of them, the father, after knowing about her infidelity.
My take on the 20 Questions is it is about the two opposite perspectives (that often clash) about love, sex, and relationship. The piece was carefully put together and tried to explain (not defend) each side of the opposite perspectives. It is a thought-provoking piece that asks so many whats and what-ifs on love, sex, relationship.
What is your definition of love?
What is sex?
How important is virginity?What if you’re Jigs, and met Yumi, would you still love her despite and in spite of what she is and what’s done. Would you love someone like
And what if you’re Jigs, and you met Yumi? Would you still love her despite and in spite of what she is and what she has done.
Would you love someone like Yumi.
What if you’re Yumi, would you let go of your needs for someone you love, Jigs.
Would you love some like Jigs.
I like how the characters were established strongly at the start in the perspectives they’re trying to portray, and then slowly mature and move towards the opposite spectrum, then overlaps. Evident in the scene where Yumi was fooling around with Jigs of not being able to say the word “Sex”, only to find herself later in the same situation where Jigs was fooling around her because she was too embarrassed to say the same word.
Another part is when Yumi suddenly became poetic, Yumi explained she wants to be a violin, she wants someone to stroked in the soul.
[...] Yumi: ‘Pag tumutugtog ang violinist, ang nakikita ko at naririnig ko, he strokes the soul of the instrument and the instrument penetrates the soul of the player. Para silang nagmi-make love. Di ba? Very Sexy, very intimate, very sublime. Di ba? Pareho silang sincere sa isa’t-isa. Dahil kung hindi sila sincere, walang music na mabubuo. The violin surrenders her body to her player, her whole body and her whole soul, in full trust and sincerity. Di ba, compared to the sound of the other instruments, and tunog ng violin paran isang naked woman? A naked woman in surrender? I want to be a violin. I want to be stroked in the soul. I want to make sincere music. I want to experience the sound of love. [...]
What made this change of hearts happened, the bottle of wine? The good conversation? Love? The 20 Questions? Maybe.
READ FULL SCRIPT HERE: 20 Questions by Juan Ekis
What interest me after watching Sunday Beauty Queen is why the movie was titled as such, and why the plot of the movie pivoted on what the Hong Kong OFWs do during Sundays. I asked my friends after watching the film on what they think was the documentary’s objective.
One said that the movie tries to show the story of the OFW in Hong Kong, their struggles, their stories abroad and their stories back in the Philippines. It is no smooth sailing adventure working abroad. The movie showed the different problems encountered by OFWs in Hong Kong, and OFWs in general. There are harsh employers, there are kind employers, and there are employers that treat domestic helpers as a family. Stories were shared on how they were treated by their employers. Some employers give them proper treatment– decent sleeping quarters, eating with their employers; while others treat them far worse than animals– horrible sleeping areas, left-over food. We do know a little about the life and struggles of OFW until this documentary.
Another said that the movie simply wants to feature Hong Kong OFW’s weekly activity, Beauty Contest, and how it harnessed camaraderie amongst themselves, and how such activity helped keep their sanity intact. It’s unbearable to imagine one’s mental torture living away from their family, dealing with problems of their foster family, problems on how to survive with their daily lives, how they were there for each other, as one family, and on how someday after watching and counting several airplanes, the next plane would be their ride home.
Domestic Helpers are also torn with the life they have and the life they are sharing with their new found family. Two stories that struck us the most are the stories of MJ. Mr. Jack, a sick old man, and his family were very good to MJ, and MJ also saw them as a family. Mr. Jack is very supportive of MJ and her Sunday events. And it broke our heart when Mr. Jack died, it was Sunday when he died. Another story was of Cherrie Mae Bretana where he gave up (at the last minute) a good opportunity in Japan for her employer’s son. It simply shows how Filipinos sometimes give themselves selflessly even to people they don’t share the same blood with.
Another said it’s a call to action– rights for all domestic helpers in Hong Kong. There were many harsh laws and regulations described in the film. Among which are the 14-day mandatory placement after being terminated by the employer, optional live-out policy for domestic helpers, poor (to no) 8-hour working policy, and the lack of support of the embassies and government of both countries to domestic helpers and OFWs.
I agree with all that my friends said, but I felt something is missing. I can’t seem to find the connection of everything to one another, especially of the title Sunday Beauty Queen. I felt there are symbolisms or a deeper meaning with the title and with what the documentary tries to portray.
Then I remembered the scene of Mr. Leo during one of the Sunday practices with the Beauty Queen. He was narrating his experience when one time he was asked what was his job in Hong Kong. He narrated, ‘When people asks me what my job here in Hong Kong is, I would answer that I am a manager. Then people would stare at you from head to toe. Then I would show them my iPhone. Yes, I am a manager. Manager of my employer.’
I realized maybe that was the connection to everything. Sunday Beauty Queen struck a balance in portraying the struggles and challenges of Domestic Helpers and breaking the stigma attached to Domestic Helpers. Domestic Helpers are not prostitutes but are moral and decent workers. Domestic Helpers are not slaves but Queens.
I remember there is one interview in the documentary where one of the Hong Kong employers said, “Domestic Helpers are very important here in Hong Kong. I can barely imagine what will happen to us without them.”
And Sunday Beauty Queen reminds us of that. Sunday Beauty Contest reminds them of that. It is more than just a Beauty Pageant, an income generating pageant, an advocacy-driven activity, a camaraderie event– it is a weekly reminder that they are important. That after a week long of hard work there is that one day in a week that would make them feel like they rule the world, that they could strut in the runway with pride like real Queens of this world because they really are. Not only on Sundays but every day.
I hope this film pushes us to make effort to value and protect our Queens, our beloved Overseas Filipino Workers. (r)
PowerMac, Circuit City Makat
Scary, thought-provoking, satisfying. A balance of suspense, drama, and some comedy. This play is a must watch!
Congrats to the amazing actors and staff behind this play!!! Ang ganda po!
Most amazing part form me was the stage/ floor set up (flying set and ‘moving’ stage). Sobrang nagulat ako sa isang part dun muntik na ako sumigaw. Dheem!!
Ang ganda at galing ng sound effects at ang creepy ng kanta na hindi pa rin siya matanggal sa utak ko ngayon. Kudos din sa lighting sobrang madadala kascene. Galing! Huhu.
The plot touched a sensitive topic not often talked about in public, Mental health. If you observe closely you’d notice many different mental health problems highlighted and portrayed by the actors: Depression, schizo, anxiety, bipolarisn, OCD, and many others that merits our attention. There’s a delicate world in there. We can’t just brush it off and not care. We need to be equipped with enough information and understanding for our friends, for our love ones, for ourselves. It can be any of us, it can happen to all of us.
Thank you to the staff and crew behind this for putting the spotlight on Mental health. Very apt for Mental Health Awareness Month! Awesome! Looking forward to more re runs of this play! :))